|
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
Building a five-story rooftop addition over seven floors
of Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center's existing seven-story
main campus on the Upper East Side of Manhattan was anything
but a run-of-the-mill hospital project.
Not only did the project team have to build atop a structure
that was grossly inadequate to accommodate the enormous loads
of an addition, it also had to complete the $99.48 million
job without interrupting patient care.
"During the entire construction schedule, the hospital
never lost a day of operation," a jury panel member said.
"This was a tough assignment executed masterfully."
The project required five new fit-up programs, including
a 78,300-sq.-ft. state-of-the-art operating suite, interoperational
pathological accessioning laboratories, new pediatric day
hospital, pediatric inpatient unit and a complex double-height
interstitial mechanical platform to support this and future
expansion.
To accommodate the loads of the addition, the project team
decided to use a system of vertical trusses, called "supercolumns,"
that would penetrate the seven existing floors like four "table
legs" and slice down through the building's existing
structural floor slabs.
To support the supercolumns, new foundations and a 22-ft.
pit for the elevator shafts had to be built below the existing
mechanical subcellar. Specialized equipment and technologies,
as well as innovative construction engineering and site logistics,
were implemented on a daily basis.
To ensure that hospital operations were not disrupted, the
supercolumns components were assembled, bolted and welded
and floor penetrations were done during off-hours (typically
overnight) within sound-deadened barricades.
After the supercolumn work was complete, the removed sections
of floor slab were repoured, the barricades were removed,
and all floor, ceiling and wall finishes were returned to
their preconstruction condition. The supercolumns were never
visible to hospital workers.
The structural and logistic challenges faced with construction
of the supercolumns were not as great as those pertaining
to distribution of the mechanical, electrical and plumbing
systems.
The floors through which the supercolumns were constructed
were built as four or five separate structures, so proper
documentation describing the MEP distribution did not exist.
Furthermore, the supercolumns were placed in locations selected
strictly for programmatic, functional and architectural reasons,
not for optimizing MEP considerations. For example, on one
floor the hospital's main power feeders needed to be rerouted
around the column legs one by one.
The project team also faced a hurdle in architecturally and
structurally integrating the addition with the existing building
to convey the impression of having been conceived and constructed
as one holistic, modern hospital building.
Despite the existing building's light-beige brick motif,
the façade architect selected a cladding solution of
a new custom-designed, sleek, translucent curtain wall system.
This system would interplay the light and shadow effects caused
by masking existing exterior masonry walls, existing ribbon-type
window systems, new and existing mechanical louver systems
and the new building's structural frame.
|